🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a pending law that include lowering the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of business advocacy worldwide. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, BAT suggests this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the bill passes.

International experts in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least half of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for multiple violations “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

In the letter, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but claims that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We reside in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and harvest that and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with current country statutes. Further, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that underage people should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to realize planned public health goals, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which includes growing volumes of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.