🔗 Share this article

Initially, Trump gave the impression to embrace a strong position concerning Ukraine. After making statements of "severe repercussions" last August in case Putin continued hindering truce negotiations, he ultimately imposed major penalties on the Russian two largest petroleum corporations, these major energy companies. This decision significantly impacted Putin's ability to support his war effort in the region.

However, with his newly presented comprehensive peace initiative for the conflict, reportedly created by US and Russian officials lacking Ukrainian or European input, he has seemingly returned to his Russia-friendly approach.

Rewarding Invasion

Trump's proposal would effectively favor the Russian leader for attacking Ukraine while placing Ukraine's political freedom in jeopardy. Despite bold statements that "The nation's sovereignty will be upheld", much of the plan actually compromise that very independence. Seen as a Moscow's wish would probably be a catastrophe for the nation.

Demonstrating his business experience, the former president seems to consider the war as a simple land disagreement, as if giving Russia a part of Ukrainian land will satisfy the ruler. However, Putin's military campaign is not merely about dominating a charred swath of deindustrialized area in Ukraine's east. It is about Ukraine's democratic governance – and Putin's apparent goal to destroy it so it no longer serves as an appealing example for the Russian citizens of the accountable governance that his increasing dictatorship denies them.

Land Giveaways

While keeping in position the presently divided oblasts of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, Trump's initiative would require Ukraine to give up the whole Donetsk region. Aside from rewarding Russia with land that its forces have been unable to capture in more than a lengthy period of conflict, this concession would make Ukraine's defensive positions dangerously compromised.

This region is the location of Ukraine's much-vaunted "stronghold system", the entrenched military defenses that constitute a critical impediment to invading forces. Trump would have Ukraine abandon these defenses, giving Russian forces a clear path to the capital in case he subsequently decide to renew the war.

Armed Forces Reductions

Furthermore, in a move that would enable future conflict simpler for Russia, Trump would mandate the nation to reduce the size of its armed forces from their existing approximately 800,000 personnel to a limit of 600,000. Importantly, the proposal sets no similar limits on Russia's military.

Seemingly as a concession to Putin's campaign to portray Ukraine's democratically elected government as Nazis, the plan asserts: "Every Nazi ideology and activities must be condemned and prohibited." Apparently to underscore this aspect, it demands that "Ukraine will hold democratic votes in 100 days" of a truce. Meanwhile, Trump places no condition that Putin jeopardize his regime by holding votes in his own country.

Defense Commitments

To be sure, the initiative has the Russian Federation promise not to "attack bordering nations" and to "enshrine in legislation its policy of non-aggression towards European nations and Ukraine". However given that Putin has breached equivalent treaties in the past – such as the Budapest accord, in which the Russian government promised to honor the nation's borders in return for giving up its historical nuclear weapons, and the previous peace deals, in which Moscow committed to a ceasefire and a restoration of captured territory in the Donbas to the government – why should anyone believe Putin now?

For this reason the Ukrainian government has been so adamant on external protection assurances. While the initiative threatens a "decisive coordinated armed reaction" in case the Russian Federation renew its military campaign, and provides that "Ukraine will receive dependable security guarantees", the details range from unclear to troubling. The proposal would not just deny the nation Nato membership but also prohibit member states from positioning forces on Ukrainian territory, effectively blocking the peacekeeping contingent, likely commanded by European powers, on which Ukraine had been relying to stop Putin from rebuilding his diminished military, re-equipping, and attacking again.

World Reaction

An additional supplementary accord according to sources would provide Ukraine with a Nato-style protection assurance, in which any subsequent "serious, intentional, and sustained armed attack" by the Russian Federation on Ukraine "will be treated as an attack jeopardizing the peace and security of the Western nations." That suggests a armed reaction. Yet in contrast to a capable Ukrainian military – the nation's most reliable deterrent against future hostilities – the effectiveness of the parallel accord would depend on the commitment of Nato leaders, such as Trump, to act with force to Putin's attacks, a response they have {not