🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.