🔗 Share this article

Throughout the previous race for the White House, the former president courted voters with promises to reduce costs immediately upon taking office. But, after his inauguration, he seemed to pay minimal attention to the cost of living. This shifted after inflation-weary citizens delivered a rebuke at the polls. Shortly thereafter, the Trump administration initiated a slapdash campaign to tackle living costs. Regrettably, the drive is a disorganized endeavor—characterized by absurdity, contradictions, magical thinking, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Grocery Store Reality

Just two days post-election, the president kicked off his affordability drive with a poorly received remark: “Food prices are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from billionaire Trump—who frequently associates with fellow billionaires—demonstrated utter contempt for everyday citizens who struggle when visiting supermarkets. In effect, he dismissed their concerns as trivial, implying they were mistaken about price levels.

This statement that everything was “way down” proved absurdly obtuse and dishonest. In what way could every price be falling when the taxes he imposed were increasing prices? Official statistics show banana prices rose nearly 7% over the past year, the price of beef climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee surged by nearly 19%—partly due to punitive tariffs on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, costs increased in the majority of main grocery groups tracked by the Consumer Price Index, such as animal proteins (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Financial Claims

In spite of these numbers, the president continues to push his big lie about lower costs. Since election day, he has stated there is “virtually no inflation,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” These statements ignore the reality that prices overall have unarguably risen since Biden left office. At present, inflation is running at a 3% annual rate, which is half again as much than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, he boasted that gas prices had fallen to around two dollars, even though official data indicate they average over three dollars.

Confronted by actual conditions and lower approval ratings, some Trump aides evidently cautioned that his “prices are down” rhetoric portrayed him as disconnected from ordinary people. A lot of citizens are frustrated about prices continuing to climb following promises of decreases. In response, aides suggested one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move clashed with the president’s unrealistic claim that additional taxes would not increase costs for US consumers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Potential Effects

As certain taxes reduced on several food items, the administration will likely claim that he has cut prices once these products start declining in price. This would be like an arsonist taking credit for extinguishing a fire that he ignited. On another occasion, while speaking fast-food leaders, Trump stated that “this is the golden age of America” and assured the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” Such statements come naturally for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to countless households facing hardships—especially when many risk cuts to nutrition assistance or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a recent poll from October, 74% of Americans believe economic conditions are fair or poor, while only 26% rate them good or excellent. Another poll showed that 61% of Americans say the administration’s actions have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Truth and Suggested Steps

Scott Bessent, the president’s chief financial officer, lately contradicted assertions of a prosperous era. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the American economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—a priority for the administration—seems to have shrunk for multiple consecutive months and shed approximately tens of thousands of positions this year. Citing this weakness, the secretary urged the Federal Reserve to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could help affordability.

Reacting to public dismay about living costs, Trump proposed a direct payment of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “high income people.” To numerous struggling Americans, this sounds like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—concerned about huge budget deficits—will enact the proposal. This idea would likely increase federal spending, push up interest rates, and potentially fuel inflation by injecting cash into the economy.

A further supposed fix for cost issues involved creating 50-year mortgages, with the notion that they could reduce monthly mortgage payments. However, the truth is that 50-year mortgages would do little to reduce installments—frequently cutting them by a small amount per month. The drawback is that these mortgages could significantly increase the overall cost homeowners pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Financial Outlook

As part of their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have once more pointed fingers at the previous president for economic problems, such as rising prices. Officials stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up the prior administration’s price hikes.” This is absurd and inaccurate claims. Actually, Biden handed over a robust economic situation, with low price growth, solid expansion, and unemployment low. But, Trump’s policies—especially his tariffs—have created an difficult situation, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

Per an economist, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their conditions worsened by the administration’s trade policies. Zandi fears that if large states like California and New York tumble into recession, the US could face a broad economic slump. During recessions, people generally possess less money to spend, and price increases often falls. Unfortunately, with the highly-touted affordability campaign probably ineffective to hold down prices, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—something that hard-pressed households cannot handle.